In its judgement, the court ruled that “an intermediation service such as that at issue in the main proceedings, the purpose of which is to connect, by means of a smartphone application and for remuneration, non-professional drivers using their own vehicle with persons who wish to make urban journeys, must be regarded as being inherently linked to a transport service and, accordingly, must be classified as ‘a service in the field of transport’ within the meaning of EU law.”
“It follows that, as EU law currently stands, it is for Member States to regulate the conditions under which such services are to be provided in conformity with the general rules of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU.”
Additionally, the court stated that Uber's services were more than intermediation as it was indispensable for drivers and passengers who want to make an urban journey. It also pointed out that the company exercises decisive influence over the conditions under which the drivers provide their service.
More information is available <%$Linker: